02
Nov
Please shut up
Ian Lang has one of the most legit manswer columns on the tubes. His post about the death of the strong silent type struck a chord:
In entertainment today, the iconic strong, silent type is still popular, but there is a growing trend toward “antiheros” who are anything but strong and/or silent. There was a great deal of talk a few years ago about the rise of the “beta male” (a term that makes me want to strangle a horse with my bare hands), and as a result, we got movies starring whiny people like Seth Rogen, Michael Cera and Justin Timberlake stepping outside the boundaries of the comedies that they should be confined to. I don’t know if it’s a case of art imitating life or life imitating art, but my guess would be the former. In a recent column entitled “The Four Worst Things about Writing for the Internet,” Dan O’Brien (one of the best online scribes of my generation) made an excellent point that the vastness of the internet means that an infinite number of media outlets are competing for a very finite number of consumers.
The world we live in grants us almost completely unfettered access to whatever information we seek. That’s great for us, but for the people supplying that information it means the competition for clicks (and any other form of audience interest) is ridiculously tough. The upshot is that competition for our attention amounts to a race to see who can generate the most controversial and sensational headlines and stories. While we’ll skip over a link that promises balanced coverage of a presidential debate, we will absolutely tune in to a television news story that talks about how Rick Perry supposedly called Mitt Romney a “bigamist Mormon queer.”
As for how this affects the strong, silent man, I think the media’s race for our attention has bled into our culture. It’s simply not en vogue anymore to not vocalize a polarizing opinion. Being strong and silent simply isn’t an option anymore, because that noise I mentioned earlier will drown you out.
I don’t know if this is the reason guys are talking a lot more these days—hell, I don’t even know if we are actually talking a lot more these days. But I do know that talking is a terrible idea when you’re looking to hook up. I can’t tell you how many times I have heard women go on about exes and obsess over that one, terrible thing: the guy who wouldn’t shut up.
The world has fed you a bunch of lies. They’ve told you chicks love to talk, chicks love a sensitive guy, blah blah blah. It’s bullshit man. When the world says women love a guy who knows how to talk, they mean a woman needs a guy who can listen and respond in a way that suggests he’s paying attention. Extra points if you can actually remember the information later. Sensitive means a guy who can guess her feelings without her saying anything. This only sounds difficult. Fem moodiness is hard to miss. Just pay attention man. That’s all you need. But this is all more advanced shit, you don’t need it on the first date.
Here’s what you do need to know right away: chicks don’t care. They want to have a good time. They want to have a conversation, maybe, but that involves repartee, not monologues about where you grew up and what you do for a living. Most chicks you meet at a club know the likelihood of a guy lying to them is high, so why should they pay attention? Yeah, yeah, you can get her an audition. Bullshit. Do yourselves both a favor and shut up. And whatever you do, don’t go all emo on her. That shit’s just stupid. I get that men have feelings, that’s cool. Feelings are to have, not to take out for show and tell, you dig? As much as chicks love the sensitive artist, they don’t really want to hear you cried watching the fucking Notebook.
Trust me, there’s a lot more you can do with that mouth. And that’s the shit she’ll remember the next day. The shit she will remember that she won’t laugh with her girlfriends about over lunch, specifically.







